So my
intro to what was supposed to be this post got a little out of hand. Now its time to go exploring. I'm coming down from a sugar high, so here's to hoping this makes sense.
As part of GW's plan to expand the defining moment in the time line of the 40K universe's pretend history, Black Library has been publishing the shit out of novels about the Horus Heresy*. For the most part, its been pretty good. They've gotten some pretty good sci-fi authors working on it and
Prospero Burns is actually in the New York Times Literary Review. Crazy.
Like a lot of you, I have mixed feelings about the amount of information we now have on the Horus Heresy. I'd like to talk more about the whole fun of trying to fill in the details ourselves prior to Dan Abnett, but that's a post for another day. In short - I think the mystery and ambiguity of the story as presented in the 2nd edition rules was in many ways more fun. However, all the detail we have know allows us to play games other than 'fill in the blanks'. Let's play 'historian'.